[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 12 from proof inv-unlink (previous step)

ino = ROOT_INO, p0 ≠ ε, dom of < ino0, afs-cons(dirs, files), of-cons(of, dirs, files) ⊦ [vfs_walk#(parent(p0), user, dirs, files, asynced; ino, err)] ( (∃ q, str. p0 = q + str ' ∧ ( ⌊err⌋ ∨ err = ESUCCESS ∧ ispath(q, ROOT_INO, ino, dirs, files) ∧ px-parent(user, q, ROOT_INO, dirs, files) ∨ err = ENOENT ∧ ¬ ispath(q, ROOT_INO, dirs, files) ∨ err = EACCESS ∧ (∃ p'. p' ⊑ q ∧ ispath(p', ROOT_INO, dirs, files) ∧ ¬ px(user, p', ROOT_INO, dirs, files)))) → ⟪dent := negdentry(p0.last); if err = ESUCCESS then {isdir := false; vfs_may_delete_check#(ino, user, dirs, files, asynced; inode, isdir, dent, p_inode, err)}; if err = ESUCCESS then afs_check_commit#(dirs, files; err; asynced); if err = ESUCCESS then {afs_unlink#(; inode, p_inode, dent, err, dirs, files; asynced); vfs_put_inode#(p_inode, of, asynced; err, dirs, files)}⟫ (of-cons(of, dirs, files) ∧ afs-cons(dirs, files)))

User applied rule skip call

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

pos: right 1

Additional information