[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 5 from proof inv-writemeta (previous step)

afs-cons(dirs, files), of-cons(of, dirs, files) ⊦ ⟪let ino = ROOT_INO in {vfs_walk#(p, user, dirs, files, asynced; ino, err); if err = ESUCCESS then choose inode with true in {afs_iget#(ino, dirs, files, asynced; inode, err); if err = ESUCCESS then if pw(user, inode.meta) then {inode.meta := md; afs_check_commit#(dirs, files; err; asynced); if err = ESUCCESS then afs_write_inode#(inode; err, dirs, files; asynced)} else err := EACCESS}}⟫ (of-cons(of, dirs, files) ∧ afs-cons(dirs, files))

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule let right

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 6:
ino = ROOT_INO, afs-cons(dirs, files), of-cons(of, dirs, files) ⊦ ⟪vfs_walk#(p, user, dirs, files, asynced; ino, err); if err = ESUCCESS then choose inode with true in {afs_iget#(ino, dirs, files, asynced; inode, err); if err = ESUCCESS then if pw(user, inode.meta) then {inode.meta := md; afs_check_commit#(dirs, files; err; asynced); if err = ESUCCESS then afs_write_inode#(inode; err, dirs, files; asynced)} else err := EACCESS}⟫ (of-cons(of, dirs, files) ∧ afs-cons(dirs, files))

Proof step 5 from proof inv-writemeta (previous step)

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule let right

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information