[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 99 from proof walk-prepost-h (previous step)

dirs[ino0] = mkdir(m0, md0, # links(ino0, dirs), m3, entries0), dirs[entries0[str]] = mkdir(m, md, # links(entries0[str], dirs), m2, entries), afs-cons(dirs, files), ispath(q, ROOT_INO, ino0, dirs, files), px(user, md0), entries0[str] ∈ dirs, str ∈ entries0, ino0 ∈ dirs, q ≠ ε → px(user, parent(q), ROOT_INO, dirs, files), links(ino0, dirs) ≠ ∅ ∨ ino0 = ROOT_INO, ∀ p1, err, p, p_ino, ino, dirs, files, q, user, asynced. # p1 < #(str + p2) → err = ESUCCESS ∧ p = p1 ∧ p_ino = ino ∧ afs-cons(dirs, files) ∧ ispath(q, ROOT_INO, ino, dirs, files) ∧ ino ∈ dirs ∧ (q ≠ ε → px(user, parent(q), ROOT_INO, dirs, files)) → [while p ≠ ε ∧ err = ESUCCESS do {choose inode with true in vfs_may_lookup#(ino, user, dirs, files, asynced; inode, err); if err = ESUCCESS then let dent = negdentry(p.head) in {afs_lookup#(ino, dirs, files, asynced; dent, err); if err = ESUCCESS then {ino := dent.ino; p := p.tail}}}] ( ⌊err⌋ ∨ err = ESUCCESS ∧ ispath(p1, p_ino, ino, dirs, files) ∧ px-parent(user, q + p1, ROOT_INO, dirs, files) ∨ err = ENOENT ∧ ¬ ispath(p1, p_ino, dirs, files) ∨ err = EACCESS ∧ p1 ≠ ε ∧ (∃ p'. p' ⊑ parent(p1) ∧ ispath(p', p_ino, dirs, files) ∧ ¬ px(user, q + p', ROOT_INO, dirs, files))) ⊦ p2 = ε, px(user, md), ∃ p'. p' ⊑ str ' + parent(p2) ∧ ispath(p', ino0, dirs, files) ∧ ¬ px(user, q + p', ROOT_INO, dirs, files), ispath(q + str ', ROOT_INO, entries0[str], dirs, files) ∧ px(user, q, ROOT_INO, dirs, files)

User applied rule case distinction

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 100:
dirs[entries0[str]] = mkdir(m, md, # links(entries0[str], dirs), m2, entries), dirs[ino0] = mkdir(m0, md0, # links(ino0, dirs), m3, entries0), afs-cons(dirs, files), ispath(q, ROOT_INO, ino0, dirs, files), px(user, md0), px(user, parent(q), ROOT_INO, dirs, files), ino0 ∈ dirs, str ∈ entries0, entries0[str] ∈ dirs, links(ino0, dirs) ≠ ∅ ∨ ino0 = ROOT_INO, ∀ p1, err, p, p_ino, ino, dirs, files, q, user, asynced. # p1 < #(str + p2) → err = ESUCCESS ∧ p = p1 ∧ p_ino = ino ∧ afs-cons(dirs, files) ∧ ispath(q, ROOT_INO, ino, dirs, files) ∧ ino ∈ dirs ∧ (q ≠ ε → px(user, parent(q), ROOT_INO, dirs, files)) → [while p ≠ ε ∧ err = ESUCCESS do {choose inode with true in vfs_may_lookup#(ino, user, dirs, files, asynced; inode, err); if err = ESUCCESS then let dent = negdentry(p.head) in {afs_lookup#(ino, dirs, files, asynced; dent, err); if err = ESUCCESS then {ino := dent.ino; p := p.tail}}}] ( ⌊err⌋ ∨ err = ESUCCESS ∧ ispath(p1, p_ino, ino, dirs, files) ∧ px-parent(user, q + p1, ROOT_INO, dirs, files) ∨ err = ENOENT ∧ ¬ ispath(p1, p_ino, dirs, files) ∨ err = EACCESS ∧ p1 ≠ ε ∧ (∃ p'. p' ⊑ parent(p1) ∧ ispath(p', p_ino, dirs, files) ∧ ¬ px(user, q + p', ROOT_INO, dirs, files))) ⊦ p2 = ε, px(user, md), ∃ p'. p' ⊑ str ' + parent(p2) ∧ ispath(p', ino0, dirs, files) ∧ ¬ px(user, q + p', ROOT_INO, dirs, files), ispath(q + str ', ROOT_INO, entries0[str], dirs, files) ∧ px(user, q, ROOT_INO, dirs, files)

Rule argument

pos: left 9

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: ⊦ ispath(ε, n, m, dirs, files) ↔ valid-ino(n, dirs, files) ∧ m = n; (s)% ⊦ valid-ino(ino, dirs, files) ↔ ino ∈ dirs ∨ ino ∈ files; (s)% ⊦ ε + p = p; (s)%a: ⊦ (p + p0) + p1 = p + p0 + p1; from specification list[path]%⊦ ispath(str ', n, m, dirs, files) ↔ n ∈ dirs ∧ str ∈ dirs[n].entries ∧ (m ∈ dirs ∨ m ∈ files) ∧ dirs[n].entries[str] = m; (s)% ⊦ afs-cons(dirs, files) → ROOT_INO ∈ dirs; (ss)% ⊦ px(user, ε, ino, dirs, files) ↔ px(user, meta(ε, ino, dirs, files)); (s)% ⊦ ino ∈ dirs → meta(ε, ino, dirs, files) = dirs[ino].meta; (s)% ⊦ mkdir(m, md, m0, m1, entries).entries = entries; (s)% ⊦ mkdir(m, md, m0, m1, entries).meta = md; (s)