[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 130 from proof infinite-append-butlast (previous step)

ii(n1 + 1) = m0 + 1, ii(0) = 0, ii(2 + n1) = (m0 + 1) + # x0, lf(2 + n1) = x0.last ' + x1, (σ from m0 + 1) to # x0 = ⌜x0⌝ , x0.last ∈ lf(2 + n1), (finp(σ) ⊃ # σ = ⌜ii(n)⌝ ∧ (∀ m. n ≤ m → (m = 0 ⊃ lf(0);lf(m).tail) = [] ∧ ii(m) = ii(n));∀ n. ∃ m. ii(m) ≤ n ∧ n < ii(m + 1)), ∀ n. n ≠ 0 → ii(n) ≠ 0, ∀ m, n. m ≤ n → ii(m) ≤ ii(n) ⊦ σ[m0 + # x0] = x0.last, x0 = [], # σ < ⌜m0⌝ + ⌜1⌝ + ⌜# x0⌝

User applied rule insert elim lemma

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 131:
ii(2 + n1) = (m0 + 1) + # x0, ii(0) = 0, ii(n1 + 1) = m0 + 1, lf(2 + n1) = a ' + x1, (σ from m0 + 1) to # x0 = ⌜x0⌝ , x0 = y + a ', a ∈ lf(2 + n1), (finp(σ) ⊃ # σ = ⌜ii(n)⌝ ∧ (∀ m. n ≤ m → (m = 0 ⊃ lf(0);lf(m).tail) = [] ∧ ii(m) = ii(n));∀ n. ∃ m. ii(m) ≤ n ∧ n < ii(m + 1)), ∀ m, n. m ≤ n → ii(m) ≤ ii(n), ∀ n. n ≠ 0 → ii(n) ≠ 0 ⊦ σ[m0 + # x0] = a, x0 = [], # σ < ⌜m0⌝ + ⌜1⌝ + ⌜# x0⌝

Rule argument

spec: list-last name: last-elim seq: x ≠ [] ⊦ a = x.last ∧ y = x.butlast ↔ x = y + a ' subst: [x, a, y] → [x0, a, y]

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: x ≠ [] ⊦ a = x.last ∧ y = x.butlast ↔ x = y + a '; (elim) Used terms: x0, a, y