[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 3 from proof perm-del-in (
previous step
)
perm(x -l a, y), perm(y, x -l a), a ∈ y ⊦
User applied rule insert rewrite lemma
And obtained the following new goals
Proof step 4
:
⊦ a ∈ y ∧ ¬ a ∈ x → ¬ perm(x, y)
Rule argument
spec: <toplevel> name: in seq: ⊦ a ∈ y ∧ ¬ a ∈ x → ¬ perm(x, y) subst: [a, y, x] → [a, y, x -l a] flags: <all paths>
Additional information
Used simplifier rules: ⊦ ¬ a ∈ x -l a; (s) Used terms: a, y, x -l a