[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 1 from proof reachable-split-last (conclusion)
⊦ r ≠ r0 → (reachable(r, r0, H) ↔ (∃ r1. reachable(r, r1, H) ∧ H[r1].nxt = r0 ∧ r0 ∈ H ∧ r0 ≠ null))
System applied rule normalize
And obtained the following new goals
Proof step 2
:
⊦ reachable(r, r0, H) ↔ (∃ r1. reachable(r, r1, H) ∧ H[r1].nxt = r0 ∧ r0 ∈ H ∧ r0 ≠ null), r = r0
Rule argument
Additional information