[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 12 from proof subset-uni (
previous step
)
H0 ⊆ H1, H1 \ H0 ⊥ H0, r ∈ H1 ∨ r ∈ H0 ⊦ (r ∈ H1 ∧ ¬ r ∈ H0 ⊃ H1[r];H0[r]) = H1[r]
Heuristic if-then-else split applied rule case distinction
And obtained the following new goals
Proof step 13
:
H0 ⊆ H1, H1 \ H0 ⊥ H0, r ∈ H1 ∨ r ∈ H0, ¬ r ∈ H1 ∨ r ∈ H0 ⊦ H0[r] = H1[r]
Rule argument
pos: right 1
Additional information