[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 4 from proof haskeys-addobj (
previous step
)
∀ r, r0, sks, class, st. r = r0 ∨ (hasKeys(r, sks, addobj(r0, class, fis0, st)) ↔ hasKeys(r, sks, st)) ⊦ r = r0, hasKeys(r, sks, addobj(r0, class, fis0, st)) ↔ hasKeys(r, sks, st)
User applied rule all left
And closed the goal!
Rule argument
[EXRARG : pos: left 1, [extquanttermlist: (r, r0, sks, class, st) abort:F , discard:T , computed:T ]]
Additional information
[[CONCRETESIMPRULES : ()], [EXTRATERMS : (r, r0, sks, class, st)]]