Proof step 24 from proof isobj-putbar (conclusion)

User applied rule insert rewrite lemma

And obtained the following new goals

• Proof step 1:

  ⊦ is_obj(r, st) ↔ r ≠ jvmref ∧ r -- _type ∈ st ∧ is_typevalue(st[r -- _type]) ∧ is_classtype(st[r -- _type] .type) ∧ is_obj(r, st[r -- _type] .type .class, st)

• Proof step 23:

  ⊦ r ≠ jvmref ∧ r -- _type ∈ putByteArray(bytes, r1, i, st) ∧ is_typevalue(putByteArray(bytes, r1, i, st)[r -- _type]) ∧ is_classtype((putByteArray(bytes, r1, i, st)[r -- _type]) .type) ∧ is_obj(r, (putByteArray(bytes, r1, i, st)[r -- _type]) .type .class, putByteArray(bytes, r1, i, st)) → is_obj(r, st)

Rule argument

Additional information

[[CONCRETESIMPRULES : ()], [EXTRATERMS : (putByteArray(bytes, r1, i, st), r)]]