[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 45 from proof validrefs-nodups (previous step)

refs2 .last = jvmref, validrefs(str, r ' + refs2, ty, st), dups(refs2), ∀ st, ty, str, refs0. # refs0 < # (r + refs2) → ( validrefs(str, refs0, ty, st) ∧ refs0 ≠ [] ∧ refs0 .last = jvmref → (∃ refs1. validrefs(str, refs1, ty, st) ∧ refs1 ≠ [] ∧ refs1 .last = jvmref ∧ refs0 .first = refs1 .first ∧ ¬ dups(refs1) ∧ refs1 ⊆ refs0)) ⊦ refs2 = [], r ∈ refs2, ∃ refs. validrefs(str, refs, ty, st) ∧ refs ≠ [] ∧ refs .last = jvmref ∧ r = refs .first ∧ ¬ dups(refs) ∧ refs ⊆ refs .first ' + refs2

User applied rule insert rewrite lemma

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 23:
⊦ dups(refs) ↔ (∃ r, refs0, refs1, refs2. refs = refs0 + (r + (refs1 + (r + refs2))))
Proof step 44:
refs2 .last = jvmref, validrefs(str, r ' + refs2, ty, st), ∃ r, refs0, refs1, refs3. refs2 = refs0 + (r + (refs1 + (r + refs3))), ∀ st, ty, str, refs0. # refs0 < # (r + refs2) → ( validrefs(str, refs0, ty, st) ∧ refs0 ≠ [] ∧ refs0 .last = jvmref → (∃ refs1. validrefs(str, refs1, ty, st) ∧ refs1 ≠ [] ∧ refs1 .last = jvmref ∧ refs0 .first = refs1 .first ∧ ¬ dups(refs1) ∧ refs1 ⊆ refs0)) ⊦ refs2 = [], r ∈ refs2, ∃ refs. validrefs(str, refs, ty, st) ∧ refs ≠ [] ∧ refs .last = jvmref ∧ r = refs .first ∧ ¬ dups(refs) ∧ refs ⊆ refs .first ' + refs2

Rule argument

[speclemmaarg: , dups(refs) ↔ (∃ r, refs0, refs1, refs2. refs = refs0 + (r + (refs1 + (r + refs2)))) ,[refs] → [refs2] ,F ,list-dup ,references ,dups ]

Additional information

[[CONCRETESIMPRULES : ()], [EXTRATERMS : (refs2)]]