Proof step 2 from proof pseq-jvmref (conclusion)

User applied rule insert rewrite lemma

And obtained the following new goals

• Proof step 1:

  ⊦ ps=(r, st, r1, st1) ↔ r = jvmref ∧ r1 = jvmref ∨ r ≠ jvmref ∧ r1 ≠ jvmref ∧ st[r -- _type] = st1[r1 -- _type] ∧ ( is_classtype(st[r -- _type] .type) → (∀ fs. fs ' ∈ instfields(st[r -- _type] .type .class) ∧ is_referencevalue(st[r -- fs ']) → ps=(st[r -- fs '] .refval, st, st1[r1 -- fs '] .refval, st1)) ∧ (∀ fs. fs ' ∈ instfields(st[r -- _type] .type .class) ∧ ¬ is_referencevalue(st[r -- fs ']) → st[r -- fs '] = st1[r1 -- fs '])) ∧ ( is_arraytype(st[r -- _type] .type) → st[r -- _length] .intval = st1[r1 -- _length] .intval ∧ (∀ i. 0 ≤ i ∧ i < st[r -- _length] .intval ∧ is_referencevalue(st[r -- i ']) → ps=(st[r -- i '] .refval, st, st1[r1 -- i '] .refval, st1)) ∧ (∀ i. 0 ≤ i ∧ i < st[r -- _length] .intval ∧ ¬ is_referencevalue(st[r -- i ']) → st[r -- i '] = st1[r1 -- i ']))

Rule argument

Additional information

[[CONCRETESIMPRULES : ()], [EXTRATERMS : (st0, jvmref, st, jvmref)]]