[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]
View long theorem info.
View the proof.
Back to main index.
View the specification.
View theorem base summary,
View theorem base listing,
the used properties by spec,
the dependency list,
the symbol table,
Proof step 26 from proof newrefs-three (previous step)
| ⊦ ¬ newref(st[newref(st) -- 0 ', noval][newref(st[newref(st) -- 0 ', noval]) -- 0 ', noval]) ∈ st |
User applied rule insert rewrite lemma
And obtained the following new goals
- Proof step 11:
⊦ r ∈ st ↔ (∃ sk. r -- sk ∈ st)
- Proof step 25:
⊦ ∀ sk. ¬ newref(st[newref(st) -- 0 ', noval][newref(st[newref(st) -- 0 ', noval]) -- 0 ', noval]) -- sk ∈ st
Rule argument
[crewrite-arg: instore
, F
, [st, r]
→ [st,
newref
(st[newref(st) -- 0 ', noval]
[newref(st[newref(st) -- 0 ', noval]) -- 0 ', noval
])]
]Additional information
[[CONCRETESIMPRULES : ()],
[EXTRATERMS : (st,
newref
(st[newref(st) -- 0 ', noval]
[newref(st[newref(st) -- 0 ', noval]) -- 0 ', noval
]))]]