[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 3 from proof weakmon-lem (
previous step
)
∃ m, n. (∀ m. ii(m) ≤ n) ∧ (∃ m. ii(m) = n), ∀ n. ii(n) ≤ ii(n + 1) ⊦ ∃ m. n ≤ ii(m), ∃ n0. ∀ m. n0 ≤ m → ii(m) = ii(n0)
Heuristic simplifier applied rule simplifier
And obtained the following new goals
Proof step 4
:
∀ m. ii(m) ≤ ii(m0), ∀ n. ii(n) ≤ ii(n + 1) ⊦ ∃ m. n ≤ ii(m), ∃ n0. ∀ m. n0 ≤ m → ii(m) = ii(n0)
Rule argument
Additional information