[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 7 from proof dups-appex (
previous step
)
a ∈ y, dups(x0 + y) ↔ (∃ a. a ∈ x0 ∧ a ∈ y), ∀ y0. dups(x0 + y0) ↔ dups(y0) ∨ (∃ a. a ∈ x0 ∧ a ∈ y0) ⊦ dups(x0), dups(y), a ∈ x0, ∃ a0. (a0 = a ∨ a0 ∈ x0) ∧ a0 ∈ y
Heuristic quantifier closing applied rule exists right
And closed the goal!
Rule argument
pos: right 4 terms: a
Additional information
Used terms: a