[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 2 from proof perm-com1 (
previous step
)
perm(x + y, z), perm(z, x + y) ⊦ perm(y + x, z)
User applied rule insert rewrite lemma
And obtained the following new goals
Proof step 3
:
⊦ perm(x + x0, y) ↔ perm(x0 + x, y)
Rule argument
spec: inst: name: shift-02 seq: ⊦ perm(x + x0, y) ↔ perm(x0 + x, y) subst: [y, x0, x] → [z, y, x] flags: rewrite, current
Additional information
Used terms: z, y, x