[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]
View long theorem info.
View the proof.
Back to main index.
View the specification.
View theorem base summary,
View theorem base listing,
the used properties by spec,
the dependency list,
the symbol table,
Proof step 2 from proof perm-shift-in2 (previous step)
| perm(x -1l a, y + z), a ∈ x, perm(y + z, x -1l a) ⊦ perm(x, y + a ' + z) |
User applied rule cut formula
And obtained the following new goals
- Proof step 3:
perm(y + z + a ', y + a ' + z), perm(x -1l a, y + z), a ∈ x, perm(y + z, x -1l a) ⊦ perm(x, y + a ' + z)
Rule argument
fma: perm(y + z + a ', y + a ' + z)Additional information
Used simplifier rules:
app: ⊦ perm(x + y, x + z) ↔ perm(y, z);%app-02: ⊦ perm(x + y, z + x) ↔ perm(y, z);%perm-one: ⊦ perm(x, a ') ↔ x = a ';%a: ⊦ (x + y) + z = x + y + z; from specification list
Used formulas: perm(y + z + a ', y + a ' + z)