[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 1 from proof subset-app-04 (conclusion)
⊦ x + y ⊆ z + y ↔ x ⊆ z + y
User applied rule insert rewrite lemma
And obtained the following new goals
Proof step 2
:
⊦ x ⊆ y ↔ (∀ a. a ∈ x → a ∈ y)
Proof step 3
:
⊦ (∀ a. a ∈ x + y → a ∈ z + y) ↔ x ⊆ z + y
Rule argument
spec: inst: name: subset seq: ⊦ x ⊆ y ↔ (∀ a. a ∈ x → a ∈ y) subst: [y, x] → [z + y, x + y] flags: rewrite, current
Additional information
Used terms: z + y, x + y