[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 24 from proof long-automatic (previous step)

0 ≤ j ∨ ~9223372036854775808 ≤ j % 18446744073709551616, j < 0 ∨ j % 18446744073709551616 ≤ 9223372036854775807, j < 0 ∨ 9223372036854775807 < j % 18446744073709551616, i % 18446744073709551616 = (0 ≤ j ∧ j % 18446744073709551616 ≤ 9223372036854775807 ⊃ j % 18446744073709551616 ;(0 ≤ j ∧ 9223372036854775807 < j % 18446744073709551616 ⊃ j % 18446744073709551616 - 18446744073709551616 ;(j < 0 ∧ j % 18446744073709551616 < ~9223372036854775808 ⊃ 18446744073709551616 + j % 18446744073709551616 ;(j < 0 ∧ ~9223372036854775808 ≤ j % 18446744073709551616 ⊃ j % 18446744073709551616;j) ) ) ) + 18446744073709551616, 0 ≤ i, 0 < i % 18446744073709551616, 9223372036854775807 < i % 18446744073709551616 ⊦ i % 18446744073709551616 = (¬ 0 ≤ j ∧ ¬ j % 18446744073709551616 < ~9223372036854775808 ⊃ j % 18446744073709551616;j) + 18446744073709551616

Heuristic if-then-else split applied rule case distinction

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

pos: right 1

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: ⊦ ¬ i < j ↔ j ≤ i;%i0 ≠ 0, i0 ≤ i ⊦ (* i) ≤ j → (* i0) ≤ j;% ⊦ ¬ i ≤ j ↔ j < i;% ⊦ i < 0 ∧ 0 ≤ j → i < j;% ⊦ i < j → (¬ ¬ j ≤ i ↔ false);% ⊦ i + j = j + i;% ⊦ i < j ∧ j ≤ j0 → i < j0; (forward)% ⊦ j < i ∧ i ≤ 0 → j < 0; (forward)