[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 10 from proof bytes2bytes-first-neg (previous step)

b2i(by) = 0, b2i(int2bytes(bytes2int(by ' + bytes)).first) < 0, ∀ by, bytes0. # bytes0 < # bytes → true → (b2i(int2bytes(bytes2int(by ' + bytes0)).first) < 0 ↔ ¬ 0 ≤ b2i(by)) ⊦ bytes = []

User applied rule insert rewrite lemma

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 11:
1 < # bytes, b2i(bytes.first) = 0, b2i(bytes.rest.first) < 0 ⊦ int2bytes(bytes2int(bytes)) = bytes
Proof step 12:
¬(1 < #(by ' + bytes) ∧ b2i((by ' + bytes).first) = 0 ∧ b2i((by ' + bytes).rest.first) < 0), b2i(by) = 0, b2i(int2bytes(bytes2int(by ' + bytes)).first) < 0, ∀ by, bytes0. # bytes0 < # bytes → true → (b2i(int2bytes(bytes2int(by ' + bytes0)).first) < 0 ↔ ¬ 0 ≤ b2i(by)) ⊦ bytes = []

Rule argument

name: bytes2bytes-zero rotate: F subst: [bytes] → [by ' + bytes]

Additional information

Used simplifier rules: ⊦ (by ' + bytes).first = by;% ⊦ (bytes + bytes0) + bytes1 = bytes + bytes0 + bytes1;% ⊦ #(bytes + bytes0) = # bytes + # bytes0;% ⊦ # by ' = 0 +1;% ⊦ 1 < m ↔ ¬(m = 0 ∨ m = 1);% ⊦ m + 1 ≠ 0;% ⊦ (m + n0) + n1 = m + n0 + n1;% ⊦ m + n = n + m;% ⊦ m + n = 1 ↔ m = 0 ∧ n = 1 ∨ n = 0 ∧ m = 1;% ⊦ # bytes = 0 ↔ bytes = [];% ⊦ (by ' + bytes).rest = bytes;% ⊦ i < j ∧ 0 ≤ i → 0 < j; (forward)% ⊦ j < i ∧ i ≤ 0 → j < 0; (forward) Used terms: by ' + bytes