[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 3 from proof count-i2j-no-dups (
previous step
)
dups(count-i2j(i, j)), ∀ j0, i0. i→n(j0 - i0) < i→n(j - i) → dups(count-i2j(i0, j0)) → false ⊦ false
Heuristic simplifier applied rule simplifier
And obtained the following new goals
Proof step 4
:
dups(count-i2j(i, j)), ∀ j0, i0. i→n(j0 - i0) < i→n(j - i) → dups(count-i2j(i0, j0)) → false ⊦
Rule argument
Additional information