[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 179 from proof n2s-s2n-identity (previous step)

∀ m1. m1 < (((((((1 + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1 → true → s→n(n→s(m1)) = m1 ⊦ 6 = pos('9', '3' ' + '4' ' + '5' ' + '6' ' + '7' ' + '8' ' + '9' ')

User applied rule insert rewrite lemma

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 180:
⊦ char ≠ char0 → pos(char, char0 ' + chars) = pos(char, chars) + 1
Proof step 181:
'9' ≠ '3', ∀ m1. m1 < (((((((1 + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1) + 1 → true → s→n(n→s(m1)) = m1 ⊦ 6 = pos('9', '4' ' + '5' ' + '6' ' + '7' ' + '8' ' + '9' ') + 1

Rule argument

spec: list-del inst: charlist name: pos-n seq: ⊦ char ≠ char0 → pos(char, char0 ' + chars) = pos(char, chars) + 1 subst: [chars, char0, char] → ['4' ' + '5' ' + '6' ' + '7' ' + '8' ' + '9' ', '3', '9'] flags: rewrite

Additional information

Used terms: '4' ' + '5' ' + '6' ' + '7' ' + '8' ' + '9' ', '3', '9'