[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 7 from proof lemma2 (conclusion)
⊦ eqd(run(cl), d, run(ipurge(cl, d)))
User applied rule insert rewrite lemma
And obtained the following new goals
Proof step 1
:
⊦ run(cl) = run(initialstate, cl)
Rule argument
[x0lemmaarg: spec-name: instance-name: lemma-name: run-initial antecedent: succedent: run(cl) = run(initialstate, cl) substlist: [cl] → [cl] add preconditions?: F is rewrite lemma?: T current spec?: T rotate lemma?: F replace all?: T paths: ((1, 0, 0, 1, 0)) dummy: () ]
Additional information
[[CONCRETESIMPRULES : ()], [EXTRATERMS : (cl)]]