[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 7 from proof switch-aux (
previous step
)
⊦ R[rs, f, g(r ; a)] ↔ R[rs, f, g], r ∈ rs
User applied rule insert rewrite lemma
And obtained the following new goals
Proof step 1
:
⊦ R[rs, f, g] ↔ R(mk(rs, f, g))
Rule argument
[x0lemmaarg: spec-name: heap-fun instance-name: heap-aux lemma-name: apply antecedent: succedent: R[rs, f, g] ↔ R(mk(rs, f, g)) substlist: [g, f, rs, R] → [g(r ; a), f, rs, R] add preconditions?: F is rewrite lemma?: T current spec?: F rotate lemma?: F replace all?: T paths: ((1, 0, 0, 1, 0)) dummy: () ]
Additional information
[[CONCRETESIMPRULES : ()], [EXTRATERMS : (g(r ; a), f, rs, R)]]