[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 3 from proof map-putex-simp (conclusion)
r ∈ H ⊦ ¬ (r => o0 * P)(H[r, o1]) ↔ ¬ (o0 = o1 ∧ (r =>_ * P)(H))
Heuristic simplifier applied rule simplifier
And obtained the following new goals
Proof step 2
:
r ∈ H ⊦ ¬ (r => o0 * P)(H[r, o1]) ↔ o0 ≠ o1 ∨ ¬ (r =>_ * P)(H)
Rule argument
[emptyarg]
Additional information
[[CONCRETESIMPRULES : ()]]