[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 16 from proof no-progress-left (
previous step
)
RG-restr(pm, R1, G1, Pre1, Post1, I, R2, G2, Pre2, Post2), Pre2(pm, s1), I(pm, s0), □ (R1(pm, S', S'') ∧ R2(pm, S', S'')), [:S | [PL S = s] ∥ [PL R2(pm, S', S'') -+-> (last ⊃ Post2(pm, s1, S);G2(pm, S, S'))]], ¬ R1(pm, s0, s), R1(pm, s0, S) ⊦
A spec-lemma