[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 18 from proof challenge3 (
previous step
)
(true * tr(r0, t1) * P)(H0), ((tr(r2, t1) * r => mknode(null, a, r2)) * P)(H), a ∈ t1, bst(t1), ∀ a0. a0 ∈ t1 → a < a0 ⊦ r = null
Heuristic quantifier closing applied rule all left
And closed the goal!
Rule argument
[EXRARG : pos: left 5, [QUANTTERMLIST : (a)]]
Additional information
[[CONCRETESIMPRULES : ([CSIMPSEQ : ⊦ ¬ a < a])], [EXTRATERMS : (a)]]