[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 19 from proof eval-nonexisting-path (
previous step
)
∀ x0, r0, H. # x0 < # x → r0 ∈ H ∧ closed(H) ∧ (∀ r1. ¬ path(x0, r0, r1, H)) → ⟪eval#(r0, x0, H; a?)⟫ (a? = none), r0 ∈ H, closed(H), ∀ r1. ¬ path(x, r0, r1, H) ⊦ ⟪eval#(r0, x, H; a?)⟫ (a? = none)
Heuristic induction applied rule call right
And closed the goal!
Rule argument
pos:right 1
Additional information
[Concretesimprules((Csimpnamedseq(eval,,, ⊦ )))]