[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 20 from proof BFS-correct-if-reachable (previous step)

∀ S0, n, n0, S, S1, source, dest, done0. m0 = # S0 ∧ 0 = n - n0 ∧ INVR(S0, S, S1, n0, n, source, dest) ∧ INV(S0, S, S1, n0, source) ∧ (done0 → dest ∈ S0) ∧ (S0 = ∅ → S = ∅) → ⟪while S0 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ done0 do { choose v with v ∈ S0 in if v = dest then done0 := true else { S0 := S0 -- v ; ADD(succ(v); S1, S) } ; if S0 = ∅ then S0 := S, S := ∅, n0 := n0 + 1 }⟫ ⟪norfail0 := (done0 ⊃ some(n0); fail)⟫ norfail0 = some(n), ¬ done0, 0 = n - n0, m0 + 1 = # S0, S0 ≠ ∅, INVR(S0, S, S1, n0, n, source, dest), INV(S0, S, S1, n0, source), v ∈ S0, v = dest, done ↔ true ⊦ ⟪if S0 = ∅ then S0 := S, S := ∅, n0 := n0 + 1⟫ ⟪while S0 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ done do { choose v with v ∈ S0 in if v = dest then done := true else { S0 := S0 -- v ; ADD(succ(v); S1, S) } ; if S0 = ∅ then S0 := S, S := ∅, n0 := n0 + 1 }⟫ ⟪norfail0 := (done ⊃ some(n0); fail)⟫ norfail0 = some(n)

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule if negative right

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

[fmapos-arg: pos: right 1]

Additional information

[[CONCRETESIMPRULES : ()]]