[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 39 from proof BFS-correct-if-reachable (previous step)

∀ S0, n, n0, S, S1, source, dest, done0. m0 = # S0 ∧ 0 = n - n0 ∧ INVR(S0, S, S1, n0, n, source, dest) ∧ INV(S0, S, S1, n0, source) ∧ (done0 → dest ∈ S0) ∧ (S0 = ∅ → S = ∅) → ⟪while S0 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ done0 do { choose v with v ∈ S0 in if v = dest then done0 := true else { S0 := S0 -- v ; ADD(succ(v); S1, S) } ; if S0 = ∅ then S0 := S, S := ∅, n0 := n0 + 1 }⟫ ⟪norfail0 := (done0 ⊃ some(n0); fail)⟫ norfail0 = some(n), 0 = n - n0, m0 + 1 = # S0, S0 ≠ ∅, v ≠ dest, INVR(S0, S, S1, n0, n, source, dest), INV(S0, S, S1, n0, source), v ∈ S0 ⊦ ⟪ADD(succ(v); S1, S)⟫ ⟪S0 := S0 -- v ; if S0 = ∅ then S0 := S, S := ∅, n0 := n0 + 1⟫ ⟪done0 := false ; while S0 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ done0 do { choose v with v ∈ S0 in if v = dest then done0 := true else { S0 := S0 -- v ; ADD(succ(v); S1, S) } ; if S0 = ∅ then S0 := S, S := ∅, n0 := n0 + 1 }⟫ ⟪norfail0 := (done0 ⊃ some(n0); fail)⟫ norfail0 = some(n)

User applied rule insert lemma

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 22:
INV(C, N, V, n, source), v ∈ C, INVR(C, N, V, n, n0, source, dest), v ≠ dest ⊦ ⟪ADD(succ(v); V, N)⟫ (INV(C -- v, N, V, n, source) ∧ INVR(C -- v, N, V, n, n0, source, dest))
Proof step 38:
⟪ADD(succ(v); S1, S)⟫ (INV(S0 -- v, S, S1, n0, source) ∧ INVR(S0 -- v, S, S1, n0, n, source, dest)), ∀ S0, n, n0, S, S1, source, dest, done0. m0 = # S0 ∧ 0 = n - n0 ∧ INVR(S0, S, S1, n0, n, source, dest) ∧ INV(S0, S, S1, n0, source) ∧ (done0 → dest ∈ S0) ∧ (S0 = ∅ → S = ∅) → ⟪while S0 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ done0 do { choose v with v ∈ S0 in if v = dest then done0 := true else { S0 := S0 -- v ; ADD(succ(v); S1, S) } ; if S0 = ∅ then S0 := S, S := ∅, n0 := n0 + 1 }⟫ ⟪norfail0 := (done0 ⊃ some(n0); fail)⟫ norfail0 = some(n), 0 = n - n0, m0 + 1 = # S0, S0 ≠ ∅, v ≠ dest, INVR(S0, S, S1, n0, n, source, dest), INV(S0, S, S1, n0, source), v ∈ S0 ⊦ ⟪ADD(succ(v); S1, S)⟫ ⟪S0 := S0 -- v ; if S0 = ∅ then S0 := S, S := ∅, n0 := n0 + 1⟫ ⟪done0 := false ; while S0 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ done0 do { choose v with v ∈ S0 in if v = dest then done0 := true else { S0 := S0 -- v ; ADD(succ(v); S1, S) } ; if S0 = ∅ then S0 := S, S := ∅, n0 := n0 + 1 }⟫ ⟪norfail0 := (done0 ⊃ some(n0); fail)⟫ norfail0 = some(n)

Rule argument

[x0lemmaarg: spec-name: instance-name: lemma-name: ADD-preserves-INV-INVR antecedent: INV(C, N, V, n, source), v ∈ C, INVR(C, N, V, n, n0, source, dest), v ≠ dest succedent: ⟪ADD(succ(v); V, N)⟫ ( INV(C -- v, N, V, n, source) ∧ INVR(C -- v, N, V, n, n0, source, dest)) substlist: [C, N, V, n, source, v, n0, dest] → [S0, S, S1, n0, source, v, n, dest] add preconditions?: F is rewrite lemma?: F current spec?: T rotate lemma?: F replace all?: F paths: () dummy: () ]

Additional information

[[CONCRETESIMPRULES : ()], [EXTRATERMS : (S0, S, S1, n0, source, v, n, dest)]]