[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 29 from proof test (previous step)

buf1 = mk(mkarray(2)[0, a][1, b], 2, 1, 1), ar0 = buf1 .data ∧ a1 = c ∧ i0 = 0 ⊦ ⟪if 0 ≤ i0 ∧ i0 < n→i(# ar0) then ar0 := ar0[i→n(i0), a1] else abort⟫ ⟪buf1 := buf1 .data:= ar0 .len:= ((buf1 .data:= ar0) .len + 1)⟫ ⟪a2 := a ; pop#(; buf1, a2) ; assert#(a2 = b) ; pop#(; buf1, a2) ; assert#(a2 = c)⟫ true

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule if positive right

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 28:
buf1 = mk(mkarray(2)[0, a][1, b], 2, 1, 1), ar0 = buf1 .data ∧ a1 = c ∧ i0 = 0 ⊦ ⟪ar0 := ar0[i→n(i0), a1]⟫ ⟪buf1 := buf1 .data:= ar0 .len:= ((buf1 .data:= ar0) .len + 1)⟫ ⟪a2 := a ; pop#(; buf1, a2) ; assert#(a2 = b) ; pop#(; buf1, a2) ; assert#(a2 = c)⟫ true

Rule argument

[fmapos-arg: pos: right 1]

Additional information

[[CONCRETESIMPRULES : ([CSIMPSEQ : ⊦ mk(ar, i, i0, i1) .data = ar], [CSIMPSEQ : ⊦ # (ar[n, a]) = # ar], [CSIMPSEQ : ⊦ # mkarray(n) = n])]]