[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 5 from proof RED-iff-reduce (
previous step
)
t =>* t', irred(t') ⊦ 〈RED(t; t0)〉 t0 = t'
User applied rule insert lemma
And obtained the following new goals
Proof step 4
:
t =>* t' ∧ irred(t') ⊦ 〈RED(t; t0)〉 t0 = t'
Rule argument
[x0lemmaarg: spec-name: instance-name: lemma-name: RED-complete antecedent: t =>* t' ∧ ¬ (∃ t0. t' => t0) succedent: 〈RED(t; t0)〉 t0 = t' substlist: [t, t'] → [t, t'] add preconditions?: F is rewrite lemma?: F current spec?: T rotate lemma?: F replace all?: F paths: () dummy: () ]
Additional information
[[CONCRETESIMPRULES : ()], [EXTRATERMS : (t, t')]]