[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 625 from proof SII-loops (previous step)

〈if m = 0 then abort else tn0 := none〉〈tn1 := tn0 ; if tn1 = none then { RED1(S _ K _ K _ (S _ (S _ K _ K) _ (S _ K _ K)); tn1): m ; if tn1 ≠ none then tn1 := some(tn1 .t _ (S _ K _ K _ (S _ (S _ K _ K) _ (S _ K _ K)))) }〉〈if tn1 ≠ none then RED(tn1 .t; t1): m + 1 else t1 := S _ K _ K _ (S _ (S _ K _ K) _ (S _ K _ K)) _ (S _ K _ K _ (S _ (S _ K _ K) _ (S _ K _ K)))〉 t1 = t, ∀ kappa0, t. kappa0 < ((m + 1) + 1) + 1 → (〈RED(S _ (S _ K _ K) _ (S _ K _ K) _ (S _ (S _ K _ K) _ (S _ K _ K)); t3): kappa0 〉 t3 = t → false) ⊦

Heuristic conditional left split applied rule if left

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 12:
〈abort〉〈tn1 := tn0 ; if tn1 = none then { RED1(S _ K _ K _ (S _ (S _ K _ K) _ (S _ K _ K)); tn1): m ; if tn1 ≠ none then tn1 := some(tn1 .t _ (S _ K _ K _ (S _ (S _ K _ K) _ (S _ K _ K)))) }〉〈if tn1 ≠ none then RED(tn1 .t; t1): m + 1 else t1 := S _ K _ K _ (S _ (S _ K _ K) _ (S _ K _ K)) _ (S _ K _ K _ (S _ (S _ K _ K) _ (S _ K _ K)))〉 t1 = t, ∀ kappa0, t. kappa0 < ((m + 1) + 1) + 1 → (〈RED(S _ (S _ K _ K) _ (S _ K _ K) _ (S _ (S _ K _ K) _ (S _ K _ K)); t3): kappa0 〉 t3 = t → false), m = 0 ⊦
Proof step 624:
〈tn0 := none〉〈tn1 := tn0 ; if tn1 = none then { RED1(S _ K _ K _ (S _ (S _ K _ K) _ (S _ K _ K)); tn1): m ; if tn1 ≠ none then tn1 := some(tn1 .t _ (S _ K _ K _ (S _ (S _ K _ K) _ (S _ K _ K)))) }〉〈if tn1 ≠ none then RED(tn1 .t; t1): m + 1 else t1 := S _ K _ K _ (S _ (S _ K _ K) _ (S _ K _ K)) _ (S _ K _ K _ (S _ (S _ K _ K) _ (S _ K _ K)))〉 t1 = t, ∀ kappa0, t. kappa0 < ((m + 1) + 1) + 1 → (〈RED(S _ (S _ K _ K) _ (S _ K _ K) _ (S _ (S _ K _ K) _ (S _ K _ K)); t3): kappa0 〉 t3 = t → false), m ≠ 0 ⊦

Rule argument

[fmapos-arg: pos: left 1]

Additional information

[[CONCRETESIMPRULES : ()]]