[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 2 from proof kappa-RED1 (
previous step
)
〈abort〉 tn2 = tn1, 〈RED1(t; tn)〉 tn = tn0, ∀ n0, t, tn1, tn0. n0 < n → (〈RED1(t; tn): n0 〉 tn = tn1 ∧ 〈RED1(t; tn)〉 tn = tn0 ∧ tn0 ≠ tn1 → false), tn0 ≠ tn1, tn2 = tn, n = 0 ⊦
Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule abort left
And closed the goal!
Rule argument
[emptyarg]
Additional information
[[CONCRETESIMPRULES : ()]]