[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 53 from proof kappa-TOPRED (previous step)

〈if ap(t) ∧ ap(t .1) ∧ ap(t .1 .1) ∧ t .1 .1 .1 = S then let v1 = t .1 .1 .2, v2 = t .1 .2, v3 = t .2 in if value(v1) ∧ value(v2) ∧ value(v3) then tn := some(v1 _ v3 _ (v2 _ v3)) else tn := none else tn := none〉 tn = tn0, tn0 ≠ none, n ≠ 0, ¬ (ap(t) ∧ ap(t .1) ∧ t .1 .1 = K ∧ value(t .1 .2) ∧ value(t .2)), ¬ (ap(t) ∧ ap(t .1) ∧ ap(t .1 .1) ∧ t .1 .1 .1 = S), ¬ (ap(t) ∧ ap(t .1) ∧ t .1 .1 = K ∧ value(t .1 .2) ∧ value(t .2)) ⊦

Heuristic conditional left split applied rule if left

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 51:
〈let v1 = t .1 .1 .2, v2 = t .1 .2, v3 = t .2 in if value(v1) ∧ value(v2) ∧ value(v3) then tn := some(v1 _ v3 _ (v2 _ v3)) else tn := none〉 tn = tn0, tn0 ≠ none, n ≠ 0, ¬ (ap(t) ∧ ap(t .1) ∧ t .1 .1 = K ∧ value(t .1 .2) ∧ value(t .2)), ¬ (ap(t) ∧ ap(t .1) ∧ ap(t .1 .1) ∧ t .1 .1 .1 = S), ¬ (ap(t) ∧ ap(t .1) ∧ t .1 .1 = K ∧ value(t .1 .2) ∧ value(t .2)), ap(t) ∧ ap(t .1) ∧ ap(t .1 .1) ∧ t .1 .1 .1 = S ⊦
Proof step 52:
〈tn := none〉 tn = tn0, tn0 ≠ none, n ≠ 0, ¬ (ap(t) ∧ ap(t .1) ∧ t .1 .1 = K ∧ value(t .1 .2) ∧ value(t .2)), ¬ (ap(t) ∧ ap(t .1) ∧ ap(t .1 .1) ∧ t .1 .1 .1 = S), ¬ (ap(t) ∧ ap(t .1) ∧ t .1 .1 = K ∧ value(t .1 .2) ∧ value(t .2)), ¬ (ap(t) ∧ ap(t .1) ∧ ap(t .1 .1) ∧ t .1 .1 .1 = S) ⊦

Rule argument

[fmapos-arg: pos: left 1]

Additional information

[[CONCRETESIMPRULES : ()]]