[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Theorem read-split
⊦ fs[ax] = ndx0 + ndx1 ↔ (∃ ax0, ax1. ax = ax0 + ax1 ∧ fs[ax0] = ndx0 ∧ fs[ax1] = ndx1)
Type: A user defined theorem
Validity: The proof is valid.
Features:
Comment:
Used by:
Used by units in proved state:
gjournal-refine
,
gjournal-base
,
Proof exists?: Yes
View
the proof
Infos about the proof
Proved?: Yes
Interactions: 2
Proof steps: 10
Used lemmas:
read-rec
,
read-eq-empty
,
read-base
,
read-app
,
Used spec theorems:
Used simplifier rules:
list
/node-list/
app-01
list
/node-list/
app-02
list
/node-list/
in-append
list
/node-list/
in-14
list
/address-list-set/
c
list
/node-list/
in-append0-not-left
list
/address-list-set/
Nil
list
/node-list/
Nil
list
/node-list/
in-empty
list
/node-list/
in-rec
list
/node-list/
c-06
list
/address-list-set/
a
list
/node-list/
c
list
/node-list/
app-08
list
/node-list/
a