[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]



View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 22 from proof inv-check-commit (previous step)

err = ESUCCESS, err = err0, remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1, elems nx ∩ jro = ∅, dom remove-refsize0(gstore2) ∩ jro = ∅, dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore2 ∪ jro, fi2.inos < pmaxino, fi1.inos < jmaxino, p_os < pmaxino, jro2 < jmaxino, inv(gstore1), inv(gstore2 \ jro), refsize-cons(gstore1, range fi2), refsize-cons(gstore2, range fi1), ri-inj(fi2), ri-inj(fi1), pmaxino ≤ jmaxino, fi1.lebs ⊆ dom remove-refsize0(gstore2), fi2.lebs ⊆ dom gstore1, fi1.lebs ⊆ dom gstore2, jvalid1 ∧ nx ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx, gstore2, jro), ⌊err0⌋ ∨ err0 = ESUCCESS ⊦ ⟪let jro1 = jro2 in index_commit#(jmaxino, fi1, true; jro1, jro, gstore2, fi2, gstore1, nx, pmaxino, p_os; err)⟫ ( p_os < pmaxino ∧ pmaxino ≤ jmaxino ∧ fi2.inos < pmaxino ∧ pmaxino ≠ 0 ∧ (jvalid1 ∧ nx ≠ [] → valid-journal-head(nx, gstore2, jro)) ∧ fi1.lebs ⊆ dom gstore2 ∧ fi2.lebs ⊆ dom gstore1 ∧ refsize-cons(gstore2, range fi1) ∧ refsize-cons(gstore1, range fi2) ∧ inv(gstore2 \ jro) ∧ inv(gstore1) ∧ elems nx ∩ jro = ∅ ∧ ¬ dups(nx) ∧ dom gstore1 ∪ elems nx = dom gstore2 ∪ jro ∧ remove-refsize0(gstore1) = gstore1 ∧ ri-inj(fi2)), jmaxino = 0, pmaxino = 0, dups(nx)

Heuristic symbolic execution applied rule let right

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information