[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 12 from proof restrict-add (
previous step
)
@(m, m3, m4) = @(m0, m1, m2) ∨ m = m0 ∧ @(m0, m3, m4) ∈ as ⊦ m = m0 ∧ (@(m0, m3, m4) = @(m0, m1, m2) ∨ @(m0, m3, m4) ∈ as)
User applied rule case distinction
And closed the goal!
Rule argument
pos: left 1
Additional information
Used simplifier rules: ⊦ @(m, m0, m1) = @(m2, m3, m4) ↔ m = m2 ∧ m0 = m3 ∧ m1 = m4; (ws)