[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Theorem crash-neutral-unmap
v ∈ avols, m < # avols[v], ebm-cons(avols), avols ⊆ avols0, ebm-cons(avols) → ebm-cons(avols0) ⊦ ⟨ebm_unmap#(v, m; avols)⟩ (avols ⊆ avols0 ∧ (ebm-cons(avols) → ebm-cons(avols0)))
Type: A proof obligation
Validity: The proof is valid.
Features:
Comment:
Used by:
Used by units in proved state:
Proof exists?: Yes
View
the proof
Infos about the proof
Proved?: Yes
Interactions: 5
Proof steps: 18
Used lemmas:
unmap
,
Used spec theorems:
ebm-base
/
ebm-le
Used simplifier rules:
array
/abstract-volume/
cngetput
array
/abstract-volume/
Put-same
array
/abstract-volume/
Size-put
store
/abstract-volumes/
At-same
store
/abstract-volumes/
insin
nat
/
lels
nat
/
ls-le-simp
array
/abstract-volume/
cgetput
array
/abstract-volume/
Put-other
nat-basic
/
lf-01
nat-basic
/
f
store
/abstract-volumes/
At-other
store
/abstract-volumes/
in-neq