[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Theorem px
⊦ ispath(p, ino, m, dirs, files) ∧ abs(tree, ino)(dirs) ∧ fids-cons(tree, abs-files(files), ofh) ∧ afs-cons(dirs, files) → (px(user, p, tree, abs-files(files)) ↔ px(user, p, ino, dirs, files))
Type: A user defined theorem
Validity: The proof is valid.
Features: s, ls,
Comment:
Used by:
px-parent
,
px-prefix
,
py
,
refine-link
,
Used by units in proved state:
Proof exists?: Yes
View
the proof
Infos about the proof
Proved?: Yes
Interactions: 5
Proof steps: 12
Used lemmas:
fid-file
,
path-in-eq
,
path-in
,
Used spec theorems:
path-permission
/posix-permission/
px
path-permission
/vfs-permission/
px
vfs-abs
/
abs-meta-h
Used simplifier rules:
afs-base
/
isexpath
afs-base
/
afs-cons-notfile
heap-sep
/dir-heap/
emp-sep
heap-sep
/dir-heap/
sep-ass
heap-sep
/dir-heap/
sep-com
afs-base
/
path-prefix
posix-base
/
meta-dir
afs-base
/
path-in-dirs