[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]

View long theorem info. View the proof. Back to main index. View the specification. View theorem base summary, View theorem base listing, the used properties by spec, the dependency list, the symbol table,

Proof step 19 from proof inv-seek (previous step)

err = ESUCCESS, dom of < ino, afs-cons(dirs, files), of-cons(of, dirs, files), fd ∈ of ⊦ ⟪if whence = SEEK_END then choose inode with true in {afs_iget#(of[fd].ino, dirs, files, asynced; inode, err); if err = ESUCCESS then n := inode.size + n}; if err = ESUCCESS then of[fd].pos := n⟫ (of-cons(of, dirs, files) ∧ dom of < ino), whence = SEEK_CUR

Heuristic conditional right split applied rule if right

And obtained the following new goals

Proof step 20:
err = ESUCCESS, whence = SEEK_END, dom of < ino, afs-cons(dirs, files), of-cons(of, dirs, files), fd ∈ of ⊦ ⟪choose inode with true in {afs_iget#(of[fd].ino, dirs, files, asynced; inode, err); if err = ESUCCESS then n := inode.size + n}; if err = ESUCCESS then of[fd].pos := n⟫ (of-cons(of, dirs, files) ∧ dom of < ino), whence = SEEK_CUR
Proof step 49:
err = ESUCCESS, dom of < ino, afs-cons(dirs, files), of-cons(of, dirs, files), fd ∈ of ⊦ ⟪skip; if err = ESUCCESS then of[fd].pos := n⟫ (of-cons(of, dirs, files) ∧ dom of < ino), whence = SEEK_CUR, whence = SEEK_END

Rule argument

pos: right 1

Proof step 19 from proof inv-seek (previous step)

Heuristic conditional right split applied rule if right

And obtained the following new goals

Rule argument

Additional information