[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Theorem inv-seek
of-cons(of, dirs, files), dom of < ino, afs-cons(dirs, files) ⊦ ⟪vfs_seek#(fd, whence, user, dirs, files, asynced; n, err, of)⟫ (of-cons(of, dirs, files) ∧ dom of < ino)
Type: A proof obligation
Validity: The proof is valid.
Features:
Comment:
Used by:
Used by units in proved state:
Proof exists?: Yes
View
the proof
Infos about the proof
Proved?: Yes
Interactions: 1
Proof steps: 51
Used lemmas:
of-cons-reduce
,
seek
,
Used spec theorems:
store
/open-files/
At-other
Used simplifier rules:
file
/
elim
seekflag
/
disj-03
afs-pre
/
pre-iget
afs-base
/
valid-ino
file
/
sel
store
/open-files/
k-At-same
store
/open-files/
In-insert
store+set
/open-files/
dom-add-in
store+set
/open-files/
dom-ins
inode
/
sel-11
vfs-base
/
of-cons-notdir
afs-base
/
getinode
abstract-file
/
elim
error-class
/
not-esuccess
error-class
/
ecommit
store
/open-files/
At-other
store
/open-files/
in-neq
vfs-base
/
of-cons-file
store
/open-files/
At-same
store
/open-files/
insin
file
/
upd-03
file
/
inj