[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 3 from proof precise-ls (
previous step
)
⊦ ∀ H, H0, H1, H2. ls(r, x)(H) ∧ ls(r, x)(H0) ∧ H ⊥ H1 ∧ H0 ⊥ H2 ∧ H ∪ H1 = H0 ∪ H2 → H = H0
Heuristic simplifier applied rule simplifier
And obtained the following new goals
Proof step 4
:
H2 ∪ H0 = H1 ∪ H, ls(r, x)(H2), ls(r, x)(H1), H2 ⊥ H0, H1 ⊥ H ⊦ H2 = H1
Rule argument
Additional information