[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 2 from proof cyclic-ncyclic (
previous step
)
reachable-n(H, n, r, r) ⊦ reachable-n(H, 0, r, r)
User applied rule insert rewrite lemma
And obtained the following new goals
Proof step 1
:
⊦ reachable-n(H, 0, r, r0) ↔ r = r0
Rule argument
[x0lemmaarg: spec-name: path-reachable instance-name: lemma-name: reachable-n-base antecedent: succedent: reachable-n(H, 0, r, r0) ↔ r = r0 substlist: [r0, r, H] → [r, r, H] add preconditions?: F is rewrite lemma?: T current spec?: F rotate lemma?: F replace all?: T paths: ((1, 0, 0)) dummy: () ]
Additional information
[[CONCRETESIMPRULES : ()], [EXTRATERMS : (r, r, H)]]