A lemma (entry) may depend on lemmas (entries) below its position, but never on lemmas above its position. This means the list is a topological order of the dependency graph. An entry 'all subs proved' means that all used lemmas are (transitively) proved.
| Name: | Status: | Subs proved? | Used: |
|---|---|---|---|
| legal-noncylic-equiv-reaches-null | proved | all subs proved | legal-nxt-1, cyclic-weak-def, |
| cyclic-brent-def | proved | all subs proved | cyclic-weak-def, cyclic-all-ncyclic, cyclic-def, |
| cyclic-weak-def | proved | all subs proved | path-nodups-subset, path-dups, cyclic-alt-def, |
| cyclic-floyd-def | proved | all subs proved | cyclic-def, cyclic-all-ncyclic, cyclic-ncyclic, cyclic-alt-def, |
| legal-nxt-2 | proved | all subs proved | legal-nxt-1, |
| reach-n-next-legal | proved | all subs proved | legal-nxt-1, |
| cyclic-all-ncyclic | proved | all subs proved | cyclic-ncyclic, cyclic-all-cyclic, |
| path-dups | proved | all subs proved | cyclic-def, |
| cyclic-alt-def | proved | all subs proved | cyclic-def, |
| legal-nxt-1 | proved | all subs proved | legal-def, |
| legal-def | axiom | ||
| path-nodups-subset | proved | all subs proved | |
| cyclic-def | axiom | ||
| cyclic-all-cyclic | proved | all subs proved | |
| cyclic-ncyclic | proved | all subs proved |