[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 7 from proof legal-noncylic-equiv-reaches-null (
previous step
)
H[r0] .nxt = null, legal(H), r ∈ H, reachable-n(H, m + 1, r, r0) ⊦ r = null, ∃ r0. reachable(r, r0, H) ∧ H[r0] .nxt = null, ∃ n. reachable-n(H, n, r, r0)
Heuristic quantifier closing applied rule exists right
And closed the goal!
Rule argument
[EXRARG : pos: right 3, [QUANTTERMLIST : (m + 1)]]
Additional information
[[CONCRETESIMPRULES : ()], [EXTRATERMS : (m + 1)]]