[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Theorem same-subclasses-all-def
⊦ same-subclasses-contains(class, str, str0) ↔ same-subclasses(class, str, str0) ∧ (∀ class0. contains(str0, mkclasstype(class), mkclasstype(class0)) → same-subclasses(class0, str, str0))
Type: An axiom
Validity: The proof is valid.
Features:
Comment:
Used by:
contains-subspec-better
,
same-subclasses-01
,
same-subclasses-array-forward
,
same-subclasses-class-forward
,
same-subclasses-contains-tdnameex-01
,
same-subclasses-contains-tdnameex-02
,
same-subclasses-contains-trans
,
same-subclasses-contains-typeex-01
,
same-subclasses-contains-typeex-02
,
same-subclasses-forward
,
same-subclasses-is-array
,
same-subclasses-is-obj
,
same-subclasses-subclass
,
validref-subspec-samesubclasses
,
Used by units in proved state:
Proof exists?: No