[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 1 from proof cons (conclusion)
⊦ unique_al((a × d)' + ax) ↔ ¬ a ∈ ax ∧ unique_al(ax)
User applied rule insert rewrite lemma
And obtained the following new goals
Proof step 2
:
⊦ p + ax = p ' + ax
Proof step 3
:
⊦ unique_al((a × d) + ax) ↔ ¬ a ∈ ax ∧ unique_al(ax)
Rule argument
spec: list inst: assoclista name: c seq: ⊦ p + ax = p ' + ax subst: [ax, p] → [ax, a × d] flags: rewrite
Additional information
Used terms: ax, a × d