[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 4 from proof choice-aux (
previous step
)
ok(a), ∀ b. ok(b) → rel(b, elemf(b)) ∧ ok(elemf(b)) ⊦ ∃ nf. nf(0) = a
User applied rule exists right
And closed the goal!
Rule argument
pos: right 1 terms: λ n. a abort: F discard: T computed: F
Additional information
Used terms: λ n. a