[Imprint]
[Data Privacy Statement]
[E-Mail]
View
long theorem info
. View
the proof
. Back to
main index
. View
the specification
. View
theorem base summary
, View
theorem base listing
, the
used properties by spec
, the
dependency list
, the
symbol table
,
Proof step 2 from proof mk-exists (
previous step
)
∀ H0. # H0 < # ∅ → (true → (∃ rs, f. H0 = mk(rs, f))) ⊦ ∃ rs, f. ∅ = mk(rs, f)
User applied rule exists right
And closed the goal!
Rule argument
[EXRARG : pos: right 1, [extquanttermlist: (∅, f)abort:F, discard:F, computed:F]]
Additional information
[[CONCRETESIMPRULES : ([CSIMPNAMEDSEQ : emp, , , ⊦ mk(∅, f) = ∅])], [EXTRATERMS : (∅, f)]]