[Imprint][Data Privacy Statement][E-Mail]
View long theorem info.
View the proof.
Back to main index.
View the specification.
View theorem base summary,
View theorem base listing,
the used properties by spec,
the dependency list,
the symbol table,
Proof step 1 from proof monge-boundedge-f-above-bound (conclusion)
(back to tree)
| ⊦ bounded≥(f, r) ∧ mon≥(f) → ¬ f(n) < limit(f) |
System applied rule normalize
And obtained the following new goals
Rule argument
Additional information
Proof step 2 from proof monge-boundedge-f-above-bound (previous step)
(back to tree)
| f(n) < limit(f), bounded≥(f, r), mon≥(f) ⊦ |
User applied rule apply rewrite lemma
And obtained the following new goals
- Proof step 3:
⊦ bounded≥(f, r) ↔ bounded≤(λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r)
- Proof step 4:
f(n) < limit(f), bounded≤(λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r), mon≥(f) ⊦
Rule argument
spec: <toplevel>, name: boundedge-neg-boundedle,
seq: ⊦ bounded≥(f, r) ↔ bounded≤(λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r), subst:[f, r] → [f, r],
<all paths>
Additional information
Used terms: f, r
Proof step 3 from proof monge-boundedge-f-above-bound (previous step)
(back to tree)
| ⊦ bounded≥(f, r) ↔ bounded≤(λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r) |
Proof step 4 from proof monge-boundedge-f-above-bound (previous step)
(back to tree)
| f(n) < limit(f), bounded≤(λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r), mon≥(f) ⊦ |
User applied rule apply rewrite lemma
And obtained the following new goals
- Proof step 5:
⊦ mon≥(f) ↔ mon≤(λ n. ~ f(n))
- Proof step 6:
f(n) < limit(f), bounded≤(λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r), mon≤(λ n. ~ f(n)) ⊦
Rule argument
spec: <toplevel>, name: monge-neg-monle, seq: ⊦ mon≥(f) ↔ mon≤(λ n. ~ f(n)),
subst:[f] → [f], <all paths>
Additional information
Used terms: f
Proof step 6 from proof monge-boundedge-f-above-bound (previous step)
(back to tree)
| f(n) < limit(f), bounded≤(λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r), mon≤(λ n. ~ f(n)) ⊦ |
User applied rule apply lemma
And obtained the following new goals
- Proof step 7:
⊦ bounded≤(f, r) ∧ mon≤(f) → ¬ limit(f) < f(n)
- Proof step 8:
f(n) < limit(f), bounded≤(λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r), mon≤(λ n. ~ f(n)), bounded≤(λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r) ∧ mon≤(λ n. ~ f(n)) → ¬ limit(λ n. ~ f(n)) < ~ f(n)
⊦
Rule argument
spec: <toplevel>, name:monle-boundedle-f-below-bound,
seq: ⊦ bounded≤(f, r) ∧ mon≤(f) → ¬ limit(f) < f(n),
subst:[f, r, n] → [λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r, n]
Additional information
Used terms: λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r, n
Proof step 7 from proof monge-boundedge-f-above-bound (previous step)
(back to tree)
| ⊦ bounded≤(f, r) ∧ mon≤(f) → ¬ limit(f) < f(n) |
Proof step 8 from proof monge-boundedge-f-above-bound (previous step)
(back to tree)
| f(n) < limit(f), bounded≤(λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r), mon≤(λ n. ~ f(n)), bounded≤(λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r) ∧ mon≤(λ n. ~ f(n)) → ¬ limit(λ n. ~ f(n)) < ~ f(n)
⊦ |
Heuristic simplifier applied rule simplifier
And obtained the following new goals
- Proof step 9:
f(n) < limit(f), bounded≤(λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r), mon≤(λ n. ~ f(n)), 0.r ≤ limit(λ n. ~ f(n)) + f(n) ⊦
Rule argument
Additional information
Used simplifier rules:
⊦ r < r0 ↔ ¬ r0 ≤ r; (ss)
⊦ r0 < ~ r ↔ r0 + r < 0.r; (s)
Proof step 9 from proof monge-boundedge-f-above-bound (previous step)
(back to tree)
| f(n) < limit(f), bounded≤(λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r), mon≤(λ n. ~ f(n)), 0.r ≤ limit(λ n. ~ f(n)) + f(n) ⊦ |
User applied rule apply rewrite lemma
And obtained the following new goals
- Proof step 10:
⊦ converges(f) → limit(f) = ~ limit(λ n. ~ f(n))
- Proof step 11:
f(n) < limit(f), bounded≤(λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r), mon≤(λ n. ~ f(n)), 0.r ≤ limit(λ n. ~ f(n)) + f(n), ¬ converges(f) ⊦
Rule argument
spec: <toplevel>, name: limit-neg-limit,
seq: ⊦ converges(f) → limit(f) = ~ limit(λ n. ~ f(n)), subst:[f] → [f], <all paths>
Additional information
Used simplifier rules:
⊦ r0 < ~ r ↔ r0 + r < 0.r; (s)
add-comm: ⊦ r + r0 = r0 + r; from specification real-basic
⊦ r ≤ r0 → ¬ r0 < r; (s)
Used terms: f
Proof step 10 from proof monge-boundedge-f-above-bound (previous step)
(back to tree)
| ⊦ converges(f) → limit(f) = ~ limit(λ n. ~ f(n)) |
Proof step 11 from proof monge-boundedge-f-above-bound (previous step)
(back to tree)
| f(n) < limit(f), bounded≤(λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r), mon≤(λ n. ~ f(n)), 0.r ≤ limit(λ n. ~ f(n)) + f(n), ¬ converges(f) ⊦ |
User applied rule apply lemma
And obtained the following new goals
- Proof step 12:
⊦ bounded≤(f, r) ∧ mon≤(f) → converges(f)
- Proof step 13:
f(n) < limit(f), bounded≤(λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r), mon≤(λ n. ~ f(n)), 0.r ≤ limit(λ n. ~ f(n)) + f(n), ¬ converges(f),
bounded≤(λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r) ∧ mon≤(λ n. ~ f(n)) → converges(λ n. ~ f(n))
⊦
Rule argument
spec: <toplevel>, name:monle-boundedle-converges,
seq: ⊦ bounded≤(f, r) ∧ mon≤(f) → converges(f), subst:[f, r] → [λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r]
Additional information
Used terms: λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r
Proof step 12 from proof monge-boundedge-f-above-bound (previous step)
(back to tree)
| ⊦ bounded≤(f, r) ∧ mon≤(f) → converges(f) |
Proof step 13 from proof monge-boundedge-f-above-bound (previous step)
(back to tree)
| f(n) < limit(f), bounded≤(λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r), mon≤(λ n. ~ f(n)), 0.r ≤ limit(λ n. ~ f(n)) + f(n), ¬ converges(f),
bounded≤(λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r) ∧ mon≤(λ n. ~ f(n)) → converges(λ n. ~ f(n))
⊦ |
Heuristic simplifier applied rule simplifier
And obtained the following new goals
- Proof step 14:
f(n) < limit(f), bounded≤(λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r), converges(λ n. ~ f(n)), mon≤(λ n. ~ f(n)), 0.r ≤ limit(λ n. ~ f(n)) + f(n), ¬ converges(f) ⊦
Rule argument
Additional information
Proof step 14 from proof monge-boundedge-f-above-bound (previous step)
(back to tree)
| f(n) < limit(f), bounded≤(λ n. ~ f(n), ~ r), converges(λ n. ~ f(n)), mon≤(λ n. ~ f(n)), 0.r ≤ limit(λ n. ~ f(n)) + f(n), ¬ converges(f) ⊦ |
User applied rule apply rewrite lemma
And obtained the following new goals
Rule argument
spec: <toplevel>, name: converges-neg-converges,
seq: ⊦ converges(f) ↔ converges(λ n. ~ f(n)), subst:[f] → [f], <all paths>
Additional information
Used terms: f
Proof step 15 from proof monge-boundedge-f-above-bound (previous step)
(back to tree)
| ⊦ converges(f) ↔ converges(λ n. ~ f(n)) |
Proof Tree for monge-boundedge-f-above-bound
(View conclusion)
The following image shows the proof tree of sequent calculus. The
proved goal is at the bottom. You can click on the nodes to view
additional rules. See here for details on colors in a proof
tree.